Archive for category Poker Run

Update on the Poker Run

 This  is a letter that was submitted today to the Whig Standard

Looks like council is trying to kill the Poker Run

While I was at the Council meeting on the 19th of January, I observed  various councillors saying good bye to a popular event.  – The Poker Run. I am not sure if these councillors think of the economic implications this decision may have.  Here is what I observed.
One  councillor made a blatant  class warfare, racial, sexist comment – His quote ” Poker Run is a rich white man’s event” .   Guess what!! People with money will spend money which helps hotels and restaurants (plus other shops) – that means more hours available to work .Some one that spoke to me said  ( not a councillor)” It will just be a few days lost work. My comment: If there are more events banned that that is even more hours. and also some people may really need and want those extra hours. Another councillor (paraphrasing)  hinted that the reason the Poker Run is being selected was timing. Someone had to be first. So reading between the lines we can expect more.
Some councillors just do not want the Poker Run
One member of council is for  carbon offset credits but realizes that if the boats go elsewhere that will not force them to pay for offsets, It  is  not going to help the environmental cause ( hats off to  Councillor Foster for this piece of common sense) . I have to give credit to councillor Hector for asking if just the Poker Run is being targeted. I did also get the impression it is a class warfare among some councillors . While another councillor mentions the  cycles of the government scaring us with climate doomsday and he reads off the  years 50’s 70’s and 90’s, he failed to mention that the 70’s was about global cooling – nice job leaving that out.  There were also a few that wanted to spend more time to determine what effect offsets may have ( at least they do not want to rush into that.) Since one councillor did hint that this could just be a start ( last month they did mention the Snowbirds) I have a question?  How much of a “carbon footprint”  will be left by the celebrities and people coming to visit for FebFest. .  What about the bid for the Memorial Cup. What about all the cars and buses and the refrigeration for ice. Will council end hockey games at the arena for the same reason. We cannot  ’Sustain’ a healthy economy  if we do not allow event to come here that bring much need money to the economy.  The usual strategy when banning things is incremental change because it is harder to notice. Let’s stop this banning things before it gets too late.

Harold Hemberger is running for council this year in the Portsmouth District

www.haroldhemberger.com

end of letter

One item that i would like to ad reference carbon footprint. How do they come up with the calculations.  You can not honestly say engine size. If that was the case there would be no need for my car to get hooked up to get tested every 2 years. It gets hooked up because they do not know my emmissions.   Right…

Update on my view on the Poker Run

The following letter was emailed to Kingston This Week and The Kingston Whig Standard on Jan 6

Make correct choice regarding Poker Run

Once again SPLASH is working at the possibility of ending the Poker Run. The Poker Run offers a positive economic impact from booked hotels and restaurants being visited. SPLASH does not want to have the Poker Run but would like to “tax” participants by purchasing carbon offsets or as I would like to call them “Guilt Credits” .I have attended a few Poker Runs and when the boats are docked the boat’s engine is off. When they leave the area they do not go full throttle. They are limited to a maximum speed of 40 MPH. In other wards this is not a race. Finish time offers no advantage to this event. Once the event starts they head directly to their next stop , away from Kingston.

Last year the organisers of the Poker Run said that if Kingston makes it look like they are not welcome, they will go down the river to a community that will ( Perhaps Gananoque since they received the Casino we voted away). I have a feeling if Gananoque welcomed the Poker Run , they would not charge them “Guilt Offsets”. My belief is that we should embrace an event that is proven to have an economic benefits to our community . This is even more true during a period of economic uncertainty. Saying no to the Poker Run and/or implanting a mandatory “tax” for carbon offsets will have a negative impact on our economy. Since there is an election later this year, I suggest the voters take note of the persons that vote against our local economy. For the record I would support the Poker Run and not support carbon offsets to be imposed.

This is a  response to a Kingston This Week (Jan 28) reader Article “Pull the Plug on Poker Run”

I agree it can be noisy, however it is just for a short duration, we do have other events that contribute noiseas well that do carry on for a longer duration. Problems is if we start canceling events because someone does not like them for some reason (Buskers creating a big carbon foot print because most of them are from out of the country,  Blues Festival  because someone hates blues, Fireworks due to loud noise, etc) we will have nothing and we can not have that. I would also like to point out that I feel I am not being hypocritical when it comes to Sustainability since I did  not vote on it anyways. We have to have a balance. I am all for recycling ,LEEDS building etc. However we can not have a “sustainable” economic base if we keep on cancelling events that help bring in much needed revenue.  One other very important item, these events help business such as( Hotels, Restaurants, etc)  get more business and when that happens staff at these establishments also benefit.  This I believe is very important.

This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro